The Food Safety Modernization Act is very depressing.

It’s standardly Orwellian in name, as legislation often is, but a really alarming number of food policy activists totally believe it is harmless to small producers. But it is designed and tailored for selective enforcement and pushing out the little guy or the medium guy in favor of outfits more Monsanto-friendly or Archer Daniels Midland-approved.

Whole foods of the sort I eat and advocate everyone eat (meat and veg from healthy animals and plants, preferably local and produced with an eye towards being able to get meat and veg from the soil for decades to come) are already semi-underground and in some cases completely illegal in this country. Raw milk should not be harder to get than Schedule II drugs. Meat from a healthy cow or goat or pig or chicken or duck, etc. should not require a speakeasy setup to purchase. We are already in that place, and people seem to think the millions of instances of food-borne illness are from raw milk or a small producer’s grassfed cow, when it’s just not the case. Anyway I struggle to articulate my discontent, but the basic point is that the new food safety law is very bad for food, safety and regular people, even if you think CAFO-style food production is awesome.

It is a pity that the food policy/food rights folks are too divided and diverse to come together and build a consistent plan of action.

Bill Marler is the John Edwards of Raw Milk Regulation

Granted, he is not so powerful as all that, but he is always lurking somewhere in the background when there’s a fresh round of attacks/restrictions on raw milk producers and purchasers.

Bleh. I just want raw milk producers to not be under such heavy restriction that 9$/gallon (for goat dairy) is break-even for many tiny producers. That’s entirely the fault of excessive and badly designed regulation. Without the regulations, even with tiny producers such milk (which would still be sanitary and lower-bad-bacteria than conventional bulk raw milk) would run about half that, or competitive to full-price milk, which I have seen as high as $4.79/gallon. Raw cow milk could easily compete with Costco-priced milk of 2 for $5 in that idyllic scenario.

1 in 4 are the odds of picking up food poisoning from conventional food of all types, according to the CDC. Needless to say, raw milk’s numbers are more like 1/20,000 according to that same organization. Also, if you do get sick from raw milk, it is usually mild. And that data is all for raw cow milk, not the more obscure, but more viable raw goat dairy.

Soil erosion– the invisible problem

http://www.ewg.org/losingground

That is not the only link I could cobble together for it, but it’s what I have time to post. Soil erosion is major, massive, just a chronic heart of our food issue, and it gets so little play. But NPK agriculture gets you to this place. Those ‘high yields’ come at a steady, corrosive cost and leave you with no ability to get more food from the ground without a lot of alternative effort.

Scalability in sustainable farming is a real topic worthy of debate, but given how everyone just ignores the soil erosion elephant in the room, I am not sure how to deal with NPK fanboys who are convinced that sustainable farmers want to kill billions with ‘dirty food’ that ‘isn’t enough’. I am also not sure how to deal with sustainable farmers who use methods that bring their own erosion issues, but handwave the matter because, like, it’s organic, dude.

Soil erosion. Start talking about it and find out how little people really understand about it as a problem, and how futile some of the solutions are that get proposed. And how interesting and old some of the effective solutions are, while others are nouveau tech.

Back from the land.

As a new mother, my infant throws me for a loop with the robustness, the mobility and the thrivingness. She keeps me busy. So this blog lay fallow for some months, and that is well, blogging is cool, but watching your child rip through milestones is so much cooler. In any case, the pace has slowed and my angel-girl seems content to come upon toddler milestones at a more normal speed. So I guess I am back to blogging here, hopefully a couple of times a week. There is just so much going on with food right now, with nutrition, with food policy, it’s just wild stuff out there. I hope to keep track of a little of it here.

This is a personal post, obviously. So the next one will be more topical.

Why I bang the nutrient deficiency gong so much.

A tiny amount of acknowledgment about vitamin D has crept into the natural birth/attachment/etc blogosphere as something pretty relevant to the poor maternal and fetal outcomes for black women. However, it’s been dismissed on the grounds that oh no, people would just hand out supplements and disregard the impact of systemic racism.

Look, let’s actually HAND OUT THE SUPPLEMENTS AND DECENT FOOD FIRST and then see what happens!

Black women have bleeding problems and various other things connected to DEFICIENCY IN NUTRIENTS that then spawn a cascade of interventions leading to c-sections and more death.

I am not under any impression that there’s no racism in medicine. If I wanted to be all colorblind, I would have had some icy water dashed on my face during my adventures at the nearest fertility hut. Lucky for me, I am not confused about that stuff, so that whole deal wasn’t upsetting, just ‘how do they fix their mouths to say this stuff to paying customers?!’

So I get that systemic racism means many black women get to ride the intervention train sooner than many white women. However, the black women are *sicker to start with*. During my first uterine surgery, I had an unusually low blood loss, low enough to rate remark in the notes along the lines of ‘damn, there’s like no blood loss here! That never happens with this kind of surgery!’ Typically for black women, blood loss is higher and complications post-surgery are a norm, not an unfortunate but planned for surprise. That is mostly nutrient deficiency, which exacerbates the effects of a miasma of racism.

People in America who aren’t urban black people are turning up with low vitamin D, nonexistent vitamin K, and so on and so forth. The blood loss and complication and wound healing issues are getting worse and worse. This is all heavily driven by nutrient deficiency. It’s not the only reason, but it is so simple and easy to fix that you can get a massive bang for the buck that is immediate and obvious and will give you leverage when you come around wanting to deal with the systemic institutional issues.

The illusion of high yield and high nutrition

http://robbwolf.com/2011/05/06/the-illusion-of-nutrient-dense-food/

The post up there explains why my title is the unfortunate reality of NPK led agriculture. By focusing on a narrowly defined metric of ‘yield’, you get moar crops, but each crop contains fewer trace minerals and nutrients, and less of major, well-known nutrients like Vitamin B/C/E etc.

You can have a surfeit of food, but you cannot be sure you will have a corresponding surplus of nutrients as well. It’s not in that link, but bioavailability of ‘added’ nutrients, like the fortified ‘golden rice’ is also a crapshoot. It is not known if golden rice actually provides the nutrient it is fortified with (vitamin A) when consumed.

The info in the link also raises complex questions about sustainability of any methods. NPK agriculture is clearly not sustainable for the long haul, as in hundreds of years, but it was clearly working pretty good in terms of yield for dozens of years. This leads people to get whiny and defensive about how awesome it is and to handwave this very real and legitimate and best of all MEASURABLE drawback– fewer nutrients, period.

I hope we can work towards sustainable agricultural methods that don’t sacrifice the soil or nutrients or too much yield. But we’ll see.

Joel Salatin is really inspiring.

Everyone should read “Everything i want to do is illegal“. It’s shocking to find out that the vast regulatory apparatus governing food in this country doesn’t do assessment of infectious, sanitary or bacterial risk in practice. Eggs are checked solely for uniformity of look. A hundred thousand white eggs full of salmonella would pass inspection, but a hundred non-uniform brown eggs do not (because some of them will ‘look weird’).

Industrial slaughterhouses are crawling with bacteria and infectious disease and are totally signed off as acceptable with the poor quality meat dumped into the stores. Sanitary small slaughterhouses are forced to shut down for not having a bathroom. It’s illegal to sell that cleaner, healthier meat except in very specific conditions.

We still have “The Jungle” conditions, even down to exploited immigrant workers being forced to work unsafely and with sanitation risks, but we don’t have any recourse except to patronise smaller guys. The very laws passed to clean up the food supply have become the means by which that unsanitary, poor quality food production is hardcoded into the American dietary system.

Yet people keep falsely claiming a nation of mostly smaller producers of clean, sanitarily produced, environmentally sound food cannot scale to enough production, but that’s not true. The baby boom, among other things, happened among a population of adults who were still getting a lot of their food that way and had grown up doing so. The birth rate statistics since 1910 are pretty interesting.

In any case, it is demonstrable that the current diet of mostly corn, soy, animals fed corn and soy, and hydrogenated vegetable oils (also mostly corn and soy– I feel like there’s some kind of pattern here…) is not really working, despite whatever ‘efficiency’ statistics can be cobbled together for this current industrially produced diet.

Going local means less variety, but then again, eating out of packages is not all that varied either, though one cannot get people to see it that way. As to it being more expensive, I am increasingly thinking that it could be competitive to the fake-cheap food out there now. It is really hard to know what the honest market price for clean food would be since it is regulated nearly out of legal existence and is steadily going greymarket.

I wish people were out in the streets campaigning for our right to clean food production and healthy plants and animals. Clean food production and healthy food does reduce health costs.

Is it really worth it to spend 10% or even less of income on food and 15-20% out of pocket on health insurance or care expenses because you’re sick all the time from the crappy diet that passed visual inspection despite being produced in literal fecal stew?

I’d rather spend 15 or 20% on food and 5% or even less on health insurance or care expenses because i’m not sick all the time. Although again, if industrial food production had to pay their actual costs, and weren’t subsidized, it might well be that we could all still be spending 10% on food and 5% on health stuffs and rejoice at all the extra money we’d have.

Anyway Salatin’s book is really eye-opening. A few thousand people trying to keep their jobs are daily ensuring that the other 300 million of us cannot eat clean, environmentally sound, healthy food.

Recipe Tuesdays: Pork Chops in Red Palm Oil.

Get two small-farm pork loin chops (bone-in) and a cast-iron skillet. Heat the skillet to medium heat and drop in 1 tablespoon of red palm oil. Toss in the pork chops and season or not as you please. Cook until palm oil is reddish but before it gets clear (about 5 mins one side, 2 mins the other side).

My husband used a lid and added a few spoonfuls of water to get the 7 minutes cooking time.

YUMMY YUMMY YUMMY.

Saturated fat is your friend!

CAFO cows are fed gummy bears

This truth-seeker explains.

The source for the data in that post.

As noted in that pdf, they also apparently get stale pasta and nuts and bread ends (all physically painful for the cow to eat, btw).

Plus the poor CAFO cattle are fed blood and bone meal as well.

Oh, and they’re still getting fed the products of distilleries as they were when the stupid feedlot system started decades ago.

It’s all just a list of horror after horror being fed to cattle and then labelled ‘farm-raised american goodness’ at the grocery store.

All this is done to reduce costs and save money. The ultimate cheapness to the end consumer is only made possible by agricultural subsidy and tax breaks specifically for large mega-farms. Yet even with the government right there funnelling money to make it all look efficient and a function of ‘economy of scale’, they still scramble to cut costs everywhere possible because despite the scale, it’s no true economy to do this to cows (or chickens or pigs for that matter).

Exercise Myth: Exercise and Hunger

It is a common myth among many that exercise leads to hunger which leads to eating a bunch of calories which leads to exercise being ‘pointless’ or ‘just for health’s sake’.

This article explores that myth.

Short version: you don’t get ravenous when you exercise, but you may get a little hungry. Also, women are more susceptible to hunger feelings than men, but can easily resolve the matter with a small amount of protein. The psychological feeling that you are incredibly hungry is privileged by many who dismiss exercise’s role in burning calories. There’s also a stubborn insistence that NO ONE EVAR fails to get hungry after exercise. But loss of appetite from exercise is not unusual among, say, chronic cardio types. This is part of how long-distance runners and chronic joggers can often stay skinny. It’s also not unusual among those doing aggressive strength training, which is healthier, but also exhausting enough to leave the old appetite killed for a time.

The exercise-hunger treadmill is just a rationalization a lot of people rely on to justify not reducing intake/increasing activity. It is a myth that needs to die in a fat-burning fire.

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: